Legal Opinion

Schumacher v. Richards Shear Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 1983PublishedCited by 260 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Simons, J.

Plaintiff Otto F. Schumacher was blinded in one eye when he was struck by a scrap of flying metal ejected by a model 300-ton shearing machine he was operating at work. He and his wife sue defendant Richards Shear Company, Inc., who manufactured and sold the machine to his employer, and defendant Logemann Brothers Company, Inc., who subsequently purchased substantially all of Richards’ assets. They seek to recover compensatory and derivative damages for the injury on theories of strict products liability and negligence. Richards Shear has interposed a cross claim…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Micallef v. Miehle Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Ladjevardian v. Laidlaw-Coggeshall, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  4. Higgins v. MasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Shane v. Hobam, IncorporatedDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by260 opinions

  1. Cover v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Seetransport Wiking Trader Schiffarhtsgesellschaft Mbh & Co., Kommanditgesellschaft v. Navimpex Centrala Navala and UzinexportimportCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  3. Cargo Partner Ag v. Albatrans, Inc. And Chase, Leavitt (Customhouse Brokers) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  4. Sukljian v. Charles Ross & Son Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Graham v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

255 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API