Legal Opinion

In re TD

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 2011No. Docket No. 294716PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

METER, EJ.

Respondent appeals as of right an order granting petitioner, TD, relief from the registration requirements of the Sex Offenders Registration Act (SORA), MCL 28.721 et seq. The trial court found that, as applied to TD, registration under the SORA is cruel or unusual punishment under Michigan’s Constitution. We reverse.

In 2007, a jury found that TD had committed second-degree criminal sexual conduct (CSC II) as defined in MCL 750.520c(l)(d)(ii) (sexual contact aided or abetted by one or more persons and involving force or coercion). The incident underlying TD’s juvenile adjudication…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. In Re AyresMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. People v. ConatMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Lanni v. EnglerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1998
  5. Doe v. KelleyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. TemelkoskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. In re TiemannMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API