Legal Opinion

People v. Conat

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 25, 2000No. Docket Nos. 218204, 219259, 219958 and 219258PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

In these consolidated appeals, the prosecutors appeal from four lower court orders declaring that MCL 769.1; MSA 28.1072 (hereinafter § 1), as amended by 1996 PA 247, is unconstitutional. The amended statute requires the circuit court to sentence certain juvenile offenders as adults. We hold that the statute is constitutional, and we accordingly reverse the orders of the trial courts and remand for trial.

I. LEGISLATIVE BACKGROUND

Generally, the family division of the circuit court (family court) has exclusive jurisdiction over juveniles under seventeen years of age who commit criminal…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. People v. AbrahamMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Manduley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. People of Michigan v. Raymond Curtis CarpMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  5. People v. FrohriepMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API