Legal Opinion

Florida Motor Transportation Co. v. Hillman

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 24, 1924PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

The defendant in error recovered a judgment against the plaintiff in error for twenty-five hundred dollars in an action for damages for personal injuries.

*514Hillman, the plaintiff below, was engaged in the work of putting up signs and advertisements on the road side on the Ingraham Highway about sixteen hundred feet south of Larkins Station on the Florida East Coast Railway. He was using an automobile and had parked the same against the curbing upon the right side of the road going south. The defendant below, the Florida Motor Transportation Company, op'erated a “bus. line” upon that highway.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. German American Lumber Co. v. BrockSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  2. Jacksonville Electric Co. v. SloanSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  3. Ingram-Dekle Lumber Co. v. GeigerSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
  4. Willingham v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1886
  5. Farnsworth v. Tampa Electric Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. White v. HughesSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  2. Williams v. SaulsSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  3. Dunn Bus Service, Inc. v. McKinleySupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  4. W. B. Harbeson Lumber Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  5. Hartquist v. Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1939

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API