Legal Opinion

Williams v. Sauls

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 31, 1942PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, J.:

Final judgment for defendant on a jury verdict is before us for review. The action is in tort for the alleged negligent killing of plaintiff’s husband, a pedestrian, by defendant’s automobile. The case was tried on declaration plea of not guilty and contributory negligence.

Plaintiff claims error in the refusal to charge on the last clear chance rule. Defendant says there was no actionable negligence proven hence the asserted error, if any, was harmless. We must therefore first determine whether plaintiff made a case sufficient to go to the jury. If so then whether the case was such…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
  2. Merchants Transportation Co. v. DanielSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. McKinnon v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  4. Southern Express Co. v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  5. Teston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Nelson v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  2. James v. KeeneSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  3. Lee County Oil Company v. MarshallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957
  4. Gallagher v. Federal Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  5. Poindexter v. Seaboard Air Line R. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1951

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API