Legal Opinion

Hutchins v. Security Trust & Savings Bank

California Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1929No. Docket No. L.A. 9139PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

This cause is a by-product of a controversy said to have existed between a man and his wife, who lived together as such for a period of sixty-four years. The scene opened with an ordinary simple action to quiet title to an undivided half-interest in certain Los Angeles property known as the Spokane Hotel. The defendant replied with a general denial of all claims made and rested its possession and right to possession of the property in suit upon a conveyance thereof to it in trust executed by the plaintiff’s testate, Caroline L. Hutchins and her husband, John S. Hutchins, on December 24, 1913.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Potter v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Matteson v. WagonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Bancroft v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Hascall v. . KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1900

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Estate of LefrancCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Live Oak Cemetery Assn. v. AdamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Corotto v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Delno v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API