Legal Opinion
Delno v. Market Street Railway Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 27, 1944No. Civ. No. 12602PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
After the plaintiffs had commenced the above entitled action by filing a complaint which we set forth in substance below, the defendants appeared and filed a motion to change the place of trial. Their motion was denied and they have taken an appeal from the order denying their motion. The complaint was substantially as follows:
“1. That at all times mentioned herein, defendant Market Street Railway Company was and still is a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California, having and maintaining offices in, and engaging in business in, the County…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- McClung v. WattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- O'Connor v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Griffin & Skelly Co. v. Magnolia & Healdsburg Fruit Cannery Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Monogram Co. v. KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Pacific Bal Industries v. Northern Timber, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- La Mirada Cmty. Hosp. v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Straube v. Security First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- La Mirada Cmty. Hosp. v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1967