Griffith v. Goforth
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil
This is a compensation case in which both petitioner and defendant have appealed from the decree of the chancellor. We will refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court. The chancellor found that the petitioner, George Griffith, was totally and permanently disabled, and “is entitled to recover under (Code, section 6878) subsection (e) as totally incapacitated from working at any occupation which brings in an income.” He further found that the injured employee was “entitled to recover under subsection (d) five thousand dollars and the costs of the cause.”
The defendant denied that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilkinson v. Johnson City Shale Brick Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- American Zinc Co. v. LuskTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
- Knoxville Power & Light Co. v. BarnesTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. MaxwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
- Ware v. Illinois Central Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Simpson v. SatterfieldTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
- Redmond v. McMinn CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
- McKenzie v. Campbell and Dann Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1962
- Charnes v. BurkTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
- Barker v. CurtisTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.