Legal Opinion

Barker v. Curtis

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1956PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice BurNett

This is a workmen’s compensation case. The only question involved is whether or not the petitioner Curtis was an independent contractor or an employee of the appellant. The Chancellor after having heard the proof in open court determined that Curtis was an employee and fixed his compensation accordingly. An appeal was seasonably prayed and has been perfected. Able briefs have been filed and argument heard and we now have the matter for determination.

The finding and memorandum of the Chancellor is in the record and portions of this finding are apropos and necessary for this decision. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. D. M. Rose & Co. v. SnyderTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Odom v. Sanford & TreadwayTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Frost v. Blue Ridge Timber Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Gulf Refining Co. v. Huffman WeakleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Finley v. KeislingTennessee Supreme Court · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Galloway v. Memphis Drum ServiceTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Wooten Transports, Inc. v. HunterTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Seals v. ZolloTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Clendening v. London Assurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Armstrong v. SpearsTennessee Supreme Court · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API