Legal Opinion

Charnes v. Burk

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1959PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Prewitt

This is a Workmen’s Compensation suit and on the hearing the trial judge found the plaintiff to be permanently, partially disabled to the extent of 25% to both hands and awarded compensation for 100 weeks at the rate of $30.00 per week, said payments to commence on May 8, 1957, plus medical expenses in the amount of $209.47.

The principal question involved on this appeal is does the statute of limitations run from the date that petitioner first observed the rash on his hands, or does the statute of limitations run from the date that the doctor said to petitioner “that’s no rash that’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Arkansas Nat. Bank of Hot Springs v. ColbertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  2. Griffith v. GoforthTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Wilson v. Van Buren CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. MaxwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Holeproof Hosiery Co. v. WilkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lively v. Consolidation Coal Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1967
  2. Clyde Wormsley v. Consolidation Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  3. Bray v. Consolidated Coal Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1968
  4. Willis Bray v. Consolidation Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  5. Wormsley v. Consolidation Coal Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API