Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Initiative Petition No. 365, State Question No. 687

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 2, 2002No. 94,155PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

11 This is an original action brought pursuant to 34 0.8.Supp.2001, § 8 by Opponents Tom Hargus and James T. Tyler and by Opponents James Talley, Kelly Barger, Sheryl Maize, George Day, Joseph Clinton Phillips, D.D.S., Mark Kelly, Judy Hamilton, Jeffrey Pearce, Bill McNatt, and Mark Ur-banosky and "John Doe" challenging the numerical and legal sufficiency of Initiative Petition No. 865, State Question No. 687 that seeks to ban cockfighting in the State of Oklahoma. We hold numerical and legal sufficiency is established and that the petition meets the standards for submission to the people.

T2…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Initiative Petition No. 347 State Question No. 639Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. In Re Initiative Petition No. 362 State Question 669Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. In Re Initiative Petition No. 358, State Question No. 658Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. In Re Initiative Petition No. 281, St. Question No. 441Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  5. In Re Initiative Petition No. 142, State Question No. 205Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Edmondson v. PearceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  2. In Re Initiative Petition No. 379Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. Yes on Term Limits, Inc. v. SavageCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. Gipson v. MoghadamCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
  5. In re the Written Protest Against InitiativeCherokee Nation Judicial Appeals Tribunal · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API