Legal Opinion

Gipson v. Moghadam

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 25, 2004No. 99,664Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

JERRY L. GOODMAN, Judge.

I 1 Fred R. Gipson appeals the trial court's August 12, 2003, judgment dismissing his referendum petition because it did not contain sufficient valid signatures. Based on the facts and applicable law, we affirm.

*716FACTS

T2 The Norman City Council approved a zoning amendment granting a special use permit for a mini-storage facility to be located in the city limits. Gipson, a Norman resident, opposed the decision. He filed a referendum petition to place the issue on the ballot.

[ 3 To do so, a proponent is required by 11 0.8.2001 § 15-108(B) to obtain the number of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Initiative Petition No. 365, State Question No. 687Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API