Legal Opinion

In Re Initiative Petition No. 362 State Question 669

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 11, 1995No. 84769PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATT, Justice.

In this opinion we will consider an appeal from the Attorney General’s wording of the ballot title for Initiative Petition 362, State Question 669, and decide whether the gist of the proposition is sufficient. We will also pass on Protestants’ claim that, if passed, the Initiative would be unconstitutional. The *1147Initiative would amend the Oklahoma Constitution to both limit the dollar amount of ad valorem taxes payable on real property, and change the manner in which such taxes could be increased.

I

THE BALLOT TITLE AND GIST ISSUES

A The ballot title is incomplete and misleading and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. In Re Initiative Petition No. 347 State Question No. 639Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. In Re Initiative Petition No. 358, State Question No. 658Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. In Re Initiative Petition No. 341, State Question No. 627Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  5. Savage v. MunnOregon Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. In Re Initiative Petition No. 382Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  2. In Re Initiative Petition No. 363, State Question No. 672Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. In Re Initiative Petition No. 384, State Question No. 731Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  4. In Re Initiative Petition No. 379Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  5. IN RE INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 403 STATE QUESTION NO. 779Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API