Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Written Protest Against Initiative

Cherokee Nation Judicial Appeals Tribunal

Decided December 19, 2006No. SC-06-12Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUSTICE LEEDS

STACY L. LEEDS, Justice.

This case involves a challenge to the sufficiency of an initiative petition. The proposed initiative seeks to place a constitutional amendment on the ballot at a special election. The amendment, if passed, will exclude a class of Cherokee citizens known as the Freedmen and invalidate the effect of this Court’s decision in Allen v. Cherokee Nation, JAT 04-09, 6 Am. Tribal Law 18, 2006 WL 5940403 (2006). There is no doubt that the Cherokee people have the legal right to amend the Constitution to redefine citizenship. The Cherokee people…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Montanans for Justice: Vote No on CI-98 Not in Montana: Citizens Against CI-97 & Property Owners Against I-154 v. State Ex Rel. McGrathMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Sturdy v. Hall, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  3. In Re Initiative Petition No. 281, St. Question No. 441Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Huskey v. MUNICIPAL OFFICERS ELECTORAL BD., VILLAGE OF OAK LAWNAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Oklahomans for Modern Alcoholic Beverage Controls, Inc. v. SheltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API