Lyles v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
Petitioner contests a determination by the Director of the Department of Employment Services (DOES) that her discharge from employment was not in retaliation for claiming compensation under the District of Columbia Workers’ Compensation Act, D.C.Code §§ 36-301 to -345 (1988) (the Act). Because we agree with the Director that petitioner failed to establish that her discharge was motivated by a retaliatory animus, we affirm the denial of reinstatement and back pay.
I
Petitioner, a special police officer employed by Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dell v. Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Galante v. Sandoz, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Galante v. Sandoz, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- George Hyman Construction Co. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Francis v. Geddes, Jr. v. Benefits Review Board United States Department of Labor, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Grant v. May Department Stores Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Children's Defense Fund v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- St. Clair v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Wallace v. Eckert, Seamans, Cherin & Mellott, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Abramson Associates, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.