Legal Opinion
George Hyman Construction Co. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 4, 1985No. 84-464PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Associate Judge:
In this appeal, petitioner contends that the Director of the Department of Employ ment Services (DOES) exceeded his permissible scope of review when he made factual findings different from those of the hearing examiner, extending the workers’ compensation eligibility period for Anthony L. Powell, petitioner’s employee. Petitioner argues that DOES regulations limit the Director to substantial evidence review of a hearing examiner’s decision, and that substantial evidence supports the hearing examiner’s conclusion that Mr. Powell’s temporary total disability ended…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Dell v. Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Perkins v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Nova University v. Educational Institution Licensure CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Gunty v. Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Stewart v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Marriott International v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Olson v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.