Legal Opinion
Abramson Associates, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 30, 1991No. 89-838PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BELSON, Senior Judge:
Petitioner Abramson Associates, Inc., (AAI) contests a decision by the Director of the Department of Employment Services (DOES) determining that AAI discharged intervenor Michelle Boyd (Boyd) from employment in retaliation for her attempt to claim worker’s compensation under the District of Columbia Worker’s Compensation Act (the Act), D.C.Code §§ 36-301 to 36-345 (1988), and ordering that AAI reinstate Boyd to her former position and pay her back wages and interest on accrued benefits. We sustain the finding that Boyd attempted to claim compensation under the Act when…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Buckner v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Twilley v. Daubert Coated Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Ford v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nolting v. National Capital Group, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Children's Defense Fund v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Mosley v. Truckstops Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- St. Clair v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Bio-Medical Applications v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & ReviewDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.