Legal Opinion
Schweig v. Maryland Plaza Redevelopment Corp.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided July 24, 1984No. 47413PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PUDLOWSKI, Judge.
This is an equitable action for declaratory and injunctive relief by appellants Martin Schweig, Jr., Robert Wood, Christopher Canepa, Adele Mitchell, James Dwyer, and Elizabeth Roth. Appellants challenged the validity of City of St. Louis Ordinance No. 58197. This ordinance named respondent Maryland Plaza Redevelopment Corporation (“MPRC”) the developer of the Maryland Plaza neighborhood in the City of St. Louis. The trial court sitting without a jury entered judgment in favor of MPRC and the City of St. Louis. We affirm.
Appellants Dwyer, Roth, and Schweig are partners in the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Gettysburg Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- State Ex Inf. Dalton v. Land Clearance for Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Kansas City v. LiebiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
- Burger v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Spradlin v. City of FultonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- Crestwood Commons Redevelopment Corp. v. 66 Drive-In, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- City of Wentzville v. DodsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Conlon Group, Inc. v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- State ex rel. Washington Avenue Redevelopment Corp. v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.