Legal Opinion

Kansas City v. Liebi

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 22, 1923PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite-, J.

This is a proceeding to restrict the use and to condemn certain rights in property along Gladstone Boulevard in Kansas City, under Ordinance No. 39946, called a “Protective Ordinance.”

Owners of certain property abutting on Gladstone Boulevard and within a benefit district were made defendants. Five defendants appeared and filed separate motions to dismiss the proceeding. The motions of two of these, Fred Liebi and T. A. Smart, with a supplemental motion of Smart,- are set out in the record. The other motions are not in the record. All the motions to dismiss were sustained December 15, 1921,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Eubank v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Welch v. SwaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. St. Louis Poster Advertising Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Welch v. SwaseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  5. Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Civello v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  2. In Re Armory Site in Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. Bowman v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  4. Americans United v. RogersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  5. State Ex Inf. Dalton v. Land Clearance for Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API