Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Queen Valley Ranch Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 30, 1971No. Civ. 12482PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRIEDMAN, Acting P. J.

Plaintiffs own 240 acres of ranch lands in Mono County. They seek to quiet title to the water of Morris Creek. In the early part of the century, plaintiffs’ properties were owned by John Pedro, who established an appropriative right to the entire flow of Morris Creek. The primary issue is whether, before plaintiffs acquired the property, non-use of the water had caused a complete or partial forfeiture of the appropriative right.

The headwaters of the creek are located in Nevada. In a state of nature the creek flowed into California, although John Pedro’s ranch was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Wright v. BestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Meridian, Ltd. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of BakersfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Casitas Municipal Water District v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  3. Casitas Municipal Water Dist v. UsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API