McFarland v. Matthai
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Louise Matthai, Rose Matthai, and Warner Temple, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
Action in ejectment. The appeal is from the judgment and is brought up on the judgment-roll alone. •
The complaint is in the usual form in actions for the recovery of possession of real property. It alleges that the plaintiff for many years prior to the commencement of the action had been, and “he now is, the owner and entitled to the exclusive possession” of the premises in dispute, and' that the “defendants have been and now are in possession of said premises,” and “have wrongfully and unlawfully withheld, and do now wrongfully and unlawfully withhold, the possession of said premises, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Payne & Dewey v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Bulwer Consolidated Mining Co. v. Standard Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1890
- Mills v. FletcherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Haggin v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Phillips v. HagartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gackstetter v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Garrett v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Victor Power and Mining Co. v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Mahan v. MillarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922