Legal Opinion

Mahan v. Millar

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 1922No. Civ. No. 3575PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

The Mahans commenced an ordinary action to quiet title against Millar, the real property described in the complaint being a certain parcel of land which we shall designate as Tract X, consisting of 360 acres. It appearing that California Oil Development Syndicate, hereinafter called the Syndicate, had acquired the interest of Millar in Tract X, the Mahans then commenced an action to quiet title to that tract against the corporation named. Millar filed an answer in the first action denying certain allegations of the complaint and he also, together with the Syndicate, filed a cross-complaint…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Earl v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Winter v. McMillanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Bulwer Consolidated Mining Co. v. Standard Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Demartin v. AlbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Goodell v. Verdugo Ca&209on Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Frazure v. FitzpatrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Pacific Palisades Assn. v. MenningerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API