Jacuzzi v. Jacuzzi
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Plaintiff sued defendants for a sum of money, alleging that the debt was incurred by defendants for work and labor performed at defendants’ request. Appellant Remington filed an answer denying the indebtedness, and also a cross-complaint, to which plaintiff made denial. The court found that plaintiff was entitled to recover, and ren-. dered judgment accordingly. This appeal was taken from the judgment and is presented on the judgment-roll alone. ■ The contentions of appellant are that the court failed to find on the issue as to the nonpayment of the plaintiff’s claim, and also failed to make…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Melone v. RuffinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Kusel v. KuselCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Richards v. Travelers' InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Grant v. SheerinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Stewart v. HollingsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by3 opinions
- Parker v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Llano Investment Co. v. MintonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Lovelace v. FreeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934