Kusel v. Kusel
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. F. J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff in an action for divorce from a judgment in favor of the defendant. The evidence is made part of the record by a bill of exceptions.
The cause of divorce alleged in the complaint is desertion. The charge is, that the defendant on December 8, 1896, without cause, deserted and abandoned plaintiff, without his consent, and with the intention to desert and abandon him, and ever since has and still continues, willfully and without cause, to desert plaintiff and live separate and apart from him against his will. The answer denies each of these allegations, and for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Monterey County v. CushingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Benkert v. BenkertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Golson v. DunlapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Speegle v. LeeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
- Connolly v. HingleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by21 opinions
- De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Floberg v. FlobergIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
- Vickers v. VickersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
- Morrow v. MorrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Betts v. BettsSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.