Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Hollingsworth

California Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1900No. L.A. No. 708PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

It is alleged in the complaint herein that the defendant represented to the plaintiff that a certain street sweeping machine was in every respect first-class and well adapted for sweeping streets, and had been thoroughly tested as such and found satisfactory; that by reason of such representations the plaintiff was induced to enter into a contract with the defendant, whereby the defendant promised to sell the machine to him, and the plaintiff, as the consideration therefor, agreed to and did deliver to the defendant another street sweeping machine of the value of two hundred and twenty-five…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Winslow v. GohransenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Himmelman v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Klokke v. EscaillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roberts v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Lincoln v. AverillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Schoonover v. BirnbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Garwick v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Jacuzzi v. JacuzziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API