Legal Opinion

Verdicchio v. Ricca

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 15, 2004PublishedCited by 124 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Long

On appeal in this medical malpractice case, we revisit the thorny problem of assessing proximate cause in the context of harm generated by concurrent forces. More particularly, we are called on to apply the increased risk doctrine in a case alleging failure to diagnose cancer. On the facts before us, it is not known whether the cancer had metastasized at the time of the deviation. As a result, the trial court set aside a substantial verdict in plaintiffs’ favor and the Appellate Division affirmed, essentially holding that *8the absence of proof regarding metastasis was a fatal flaw in…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Dolson v. AnastasiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  3. State v. CarterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. Sons of Thunder, Inc. v. Borden, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  5. Harry J. Hicks, Administrator of the Estate of Carol Greitens, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by124 opinions

  1. Hisenaj v. KuehnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  2. Zive v. Stanley Roberts, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  3. State v. BranchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  4. Murphy v. ImplicitoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  5. Real v. Radir Wheels, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API