State v. Branch
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Albin
The right of a party to confront witnesses in court is one of the principal values protected by the hearsay rule. The rule generally shields a party from damning out-of-court statements, which are offered for their truth but are not subject to the truth-testing rigors of cross-examination. Our evidentiary rules and case law recognize many exceptions to the hearsay rule that promote both the efficiency and the fact-finding integrity of trials. This appeal explores whether hearsay used by the State to convict defendant of burglary and robbery fell within legitimate exceptions to the hearsay…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- State v. RoseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- State v. ChunSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- State v. LazoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
- State v. Jahnell Weaver (069185)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
- State v. Julie KuropchakSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.