Legal Opinion

Hisenaj v. Kuehner

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 6, 2008PublishedCited by 177 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice LaVECCHIA

The issue in this appeal arose out of the trial of a personal-injury action for injuries sustained in an automobile accident. The jury’s verdict was largely in favor of defendant, and plaintiff appealed. A panel of the Appellate Division reversed and held that plaintiff was entitled to a new trial because the trial court erred in admitting expert testimony from defendant’s biomechanical engineer. Hisenaj v. Kuehner, 387 N.J.Super. 262, 277, 903 A.2d 1068 (App.Div.2006). We granted defendant’s petition for certification, 189 N.J. 427, 915 A.2d 1050 (2007), and now reverse. Based on the record…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. State v. HarveySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  3. State v. TorresSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  4. State v. WakefieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  5. Oswin v. ShawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by177 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  2. Estate of Hanges v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  3. Litton Industries, Inc. v. IMO Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  4. State v. Julie KuropchakSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  5. State v. J.R.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017

172 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API