Legal Opinion
Ganter v. Unit Venetian Blind Supply Corp.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided December 8, 1949No. 9833PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
The motion of the Plaintiff, filed November 16, 1949, for a preliminary injunction, heretofore argued and submitted, is now decided as follows:
The said motion is hereby denied.
Comment
Patent No. 2391150, issued on December 18, 1945, and the reissue, dated March 23, 1948, Letters Patent Reissue No. 22989, relate to “window drape rod hanging means”. The device is rather simple and its object is to hold in place a rod on which drapes can be hung. The defendant has filed an answer in the usual “stock form” used in patent litigation, denying infringement, and charging lack…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Market Street Cable Railway Co. v. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Pointer v. Six Wheel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Bowers v. E. J. Rose Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Grant v. KopplCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- McRoskey v. Braun Mattress Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pacific Cage & Screen Co. v. Continental Cage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Artmoore Co. v. Dayless Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1951
- Pacific Cage & Screen Co. v. Continental Cage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Ganter v. Unit Venetian Blind Supply Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1950