Legal Opinion
Ganter v. Unit Venetian Blind Supply Corp.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 20, 1950No. 9833Published
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
The plaintiff charges infringement and seeks injunctive relief and damages. The defendant has denied infringement and, in a general way only, has challenged the validity of the patent.
I am of the view that Patent No. 2,391,150, and Reissue No. 22,989, are valid, but not infringed by the defendants’ devices.
Some of the principles of law applicable were discussed at the conclusion of the trial .and are not in dispute. Others were stated in the brief opinion on the application for injunction. Ganter v. Unit Venetian Blind Supply Corp., D.C.1949, 87 F.Supp. 338. And see,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Smith v. SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Smith v. Magic City Kennel Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.