Legal Opinion
Bowers v. E. J. Rose Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 1, 1945No. 10742PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by plaintiffs below, suing for infringement of patent No. 2,123,709, from (a) a summary judgment dated May 25, 1943, dismissing appellants’ complaint as to appellee E. J. Rose Manufacturing Company of California, hereafter called Rose; (b) a summary judgment dated June 8, 1943, dismissing appellants’ complaint as to Fischer Corporation, Robert A. Fischer and A. S. Aloe Company, hereafter called Fischers; and (c) an order of date August 16, 1943, denying appellant’s motion filed on that date to set aside the judgments and permit them to proceed with the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hicks v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- National Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
- Republic Supply Co. v. Richfield Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Farley v. AbbetmeierCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Rubens v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
3Cited by25 opinions
- Antonio Paliaga v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, and Third-Party v. Turner & Blanchard, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Jose Rivera v. M/t FossarinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Moosman v. Joseph P. Blitz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Robert Allen French v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Steccone v. Morse-Starrett Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.