Artmoore Co. v. Dayless Mfg. Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
LA BUY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have filed a motion for preliminary injunction to restrain defendants from manufacturing and selling a mop sold under the trade-mark Kleen-Rite which is alleged to infringe on plaintiffs’ mop manufactured and sold under the trade-mark New Art. As was stated in Sinko Tool & Mfg. Co. v. Casco Products Corporation, 7 Cir., 1937, 89 F.2d 916, 921 :
“ * * * This court in Standard Elevator v. Crane Elevator Co., 7 Cir., 56 F. 718, 719, said:
“ ‘The purpose of the interlocutory writ is not to conclude the question of right, but to protect against material injury…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lawrence v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Standard Elevator Co. v. Crane Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1893
- Bowers v. E. J. Rose Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Sinko Tool & Mfg. Co. v. Casco Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Ganter v. Unit Venetian Blind Supply Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Signode Corporation v. Weld-Loc Systems, Inc. And Strapex AgCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983