Legal Opinion

Ranes v. American Family Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 31, 1997No. 97-0441PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyse, J.

John and Mary Ranes appeal a judgment dismissing their action against American Family Mutual Insurance Company, the Ranes' underinsured motorist carrier. The Ranes contend the trial court erred by concluding that their failure to give notice of a settlement between the insured and the tortfeasor as required by Vogt v. Schroeder, 129 Wis. 2d 3, 383 N.W.2d 876 (1986), is a bar to UIM coverage without regard to whether the underinsurer has been prejudiced by the failure to receive notice. Because we conclude that underinsured motorist coverage will not be defeated by failure to give the required…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. Gulf Group LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Management Computer Services, Inc. v. Hawkins, Ash, Baptie & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Smith v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Vogt v. SchroederWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Danbeck v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Ranes v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Neff v. PierzinaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Companies v. LotzDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
  5. Danbeck v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API