Legal Opinion
Romska v. Opper
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided June 22, 1999No. Docket 195410PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarkman, P.J.
Plaintiff appeals as of right from the order of the lower court granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7) (release). We affirm.
This case arises from a May 1994 automobile accident. Plaintiff’s vehicle was struck by a vehicle owned by Boyan Daskal and driven by Veliko Velikov. Defendant David Opper allegedly caused Velikov to swerve into oncoming traffic and strike plaintiff’s vehicle. Without bringing suit, plaintiff filed personal injury claims with Farm Bureau Insurance, the insurer of the Velikov vehicle, and American States Insurance Company,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- UAW-GM Human Resource Center v. KSL Recreation Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Weymers v. KheraMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Meagher v. Wayne State UniversityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Denton v. UtleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Shay v. AldrichMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- Heritage Resources, Inc. v. Caterpillar Financial Services Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Batshon v. Mar-Que General Contractors, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Peters v. Gunnell, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Collucci v. EklundMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.