Legal Opinion

Berkel & Co. Contractors v. Christman Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1995No. Docket 157736PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHood, J.

Berkel & Company Contractors appeals as of right from a judgment in the Washtenaw Circuit Court that held that Berkel, a subcontractor, was not entitled to payment for construction work until the general contractor was paid for that work by the owner. We affirm.

In October 1989, Christman Company entered into a contract with Anthony S. Brown Development Company, Inc., (asb) and Anthony S. Brown (Brown) to act as the construction manager on a certain project. Eventually, Christman sued asb and Brown, seeking payment for work performed. At the time that construction began, asb and Brown assured…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. VaughnMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. A. F. Young & Co. v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Arrow Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Bryant & Detwiler Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Lee v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Able Demolition, Inc v. City of PontiacMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. BMD CONTRACTORS v. Fidelity and Deposit Co. of Md.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  3. Harbor Park Market, Inc v. GrondaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Aidamark, Inc. v. Roll Forming CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  5. BMS Natural Resources, Inc. v. Krupp Lonrho Min. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API