Berkel & Co. Contractors v. Christman Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHood, J.
Berkel & Company Contractors appeals as of right from a judgment in the Washtenaw Circuit Court that held that Berkel, a subcontractor, was not entitled to payment for construction work until the general contractor was paid for that work by the owner. We affirm.
In October 1989, Christman Company entered into a contract with Anthony S. Brown Development Company, Inc., (asb) and Anthony S. Brown (Brown) to act as the construction manager on a certain project. Eventually, Christman sued asb and Brown, seeking payment for work performed. At the time that construction began, asb and Brown assured…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. VaughnMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- A. F. Young & Co. v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Arrow Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Bryant & Detwiler Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Lee v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
3Cited by7 opinions
- Able Demolition, Inc v. City of PontiacMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- BMD CONTRACTORS v. Fidelity and Deposit Co. of Md.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Harbor Park Market, Inc v. GrondaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Aidamark, Inc. v. Roll Forming CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- BMS Natural Resources, Inc. v. Krupp Lonrho Min. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.