State v. Maupin
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLABORNE, Presiding Judge.
Appellant contends that the trial court erred in requiring her to pay the costs of her extradition as stipulated to in the plea agreement. We affirm the trial court’s judgment of conviction and sentence.
FACTS
On November 12, 1987, the Maricopa County Grand Jury indicted appellant on three counts of obtaining narcotic drugs by fraud (CR-87-10158). Appellant allegedly had obtained Tussionex through the use of forged prescriptions. Pursuant to a plea agreement, appellant pled guilty to Count I, obtaining a narcotic drug by fraud, and an amended Count II, attempt…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. HannahArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. McCartyIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- United States v. James Randall DurhamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- People v. EvansAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- State v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- State v. GuilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- State v. CawyerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. RyythSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.