Lewis v. Hayes
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
VICTOR E. SHAW, J., pro tem.
Action to recover both general and special damages for a libel published by defendant and appellant of and concerning plaintiff.
Judgment went for plaintiff, from which, and an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.
The case was here on a former appeal (Lewis v. Hayes, 165 Cal. 527, [Ann. Cas. 1914D, 148, 132 Pac. 122]), to the opinion in which reference is made for a full statement of the facts involved.
The claim for special damages as set out in the complaint was based upon the fact that at the time in question plaintiff was engaged in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bettner v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Collier v. Postum Cereal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Lewis v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Constitution Publishing Co. v. WaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Simpson v. Press Publishing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Clark v. McClurgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Rosenberg v. J. C. Penney Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- De Franco v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955
- Leh v. General Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
- Carnation Co. v. Olivet Egg RanchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.