Legal Opinion

Bettner v. Holt

California Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1886No. 11511PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Foote, C.

Bettner brought an action against Holt for a libelous and unprivileged publication.

The complaint was demurred to as not stating facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; the demurrer was sustained, and the plaintiff not having filed an amended complaint within the time allowed by the court, judgment for costs, etc., was given in favor of the defendant, from which the plaintiff has appealed.

The pleading which was on demurrer held insufficient is as follows:—

*271“The plaintiff for cause of action against the defendant alleges,—
“That the plaintiff and others, being at the time…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Spencer v. SouthwickNew York Supreme Court · 1813

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Kapellas v. KofmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Morse v. Times-Republican Printing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Polygram Records, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Earl v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1921

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API