Legal Opinion
Leh v. General Petroleum Corporation
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 15, 1958No. 20531PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHES, District Judge.
This is a private antitrust action, brought pursuant to § 4 of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 731 (1914) [15 U.S.C.A. § 15], wherein plaintiffs seek treble damages for injuries allegedly sustained by reason of claimed violations of §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 26 Stat. 209 (1890), as amended [15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1 and 2], Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under § 4 of the Clayton Act and 28 U.S.C. § 1337.
Defendants have not as yet answered the complaint, but have interposed three motions now before the Court:
“(1) For a judgment dismissing the action as far as it…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Sola Electric Co. v. Jefferson Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Radovich v. National Football LeagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Klebanow v. New York Produce ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Carnation Co. v. Olivet Egg RanchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Delbon Radiology v. Turlock Diagnostic CenterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1993
- McCormack v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.