Kubes v. Hillman Coal & Coke Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Linn, J.,
This appeal is from the refusal of Workmen’s Compensation. We agree with the referee, the board and the court below that plaintiff is not entitled to an award for reasons that we shall state.
The referee’s findings of fact approved by the board and supported by evidence show that plaintiff was a bituminous coal miner. He left his place of work at quitting time on a Saturday. On his return on the following Monday with a fellow workman, Farkas, “they found,” in the words of the referee, “that there had been a cave-in and tbeir tools had been buried under the debris. They made…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shoffler v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Hale v. Savage Fire Brick Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Gurski v. Susquehanna Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Walcofski v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Granville v. Scranton Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Paul Gima v. the Hudson Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Haywood v. Henrietta Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Salt Lake City v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- MacEnka v. Lehigh C. & Nav. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Murphy v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1929