Legal Opinion
Salt Lake City v. Industrial Commission
Utah Supreme Court
Decided May 3, 1943No. 6462PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLFE, Chief Justice.
On September 17,1941, Edren Erickson filed a claim with the Industrial Commission in which he alleged that he was injured on August 26,1941, while employed as a truck helper by Salt Lake City Department of Streets and Public Improvement. He further alleged that the injury arose out of or in the course of this employment. The Commission made an award to Erickson and Salt Lake City appealed.
The employment by the city and the injury while at the place of his employment are admitted by the city. The only question raised by the appeal is: Did the injury arise out of or in the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Fournier's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
- Enfield v. the Certain-Teed Prod. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- Moray v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1921
- Twin Peaks Canning Co. v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1921
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- M & K Corp. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1948
- Oklahoma Railway Co. v. CannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Northern Oil Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Buhler v. MaddisonUtah Supreme Court · 1946
- Mower v. McCARTHYUtah Supreme Court · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.