MacEnka v. Lehigh C. & Nav. Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Linn, J.,
Claimant’s husband was suffocated by “mine gas.” The compensation authorities and the learned court below agreed in refusing compensation on the ground that he had taken himself out of the course of his employment by entering a prohibited area. On the facts found by the compensation board, we must affirm the order.
Gas was found July 8 in the chute in which decedent had been working, whereupon further mining was ordered suspended. In the words of the finding: “The day following, or July 9, 1930, the decedent and three other men were put to work constructing a ventilator…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Shoffler v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Dickey v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Walcofski v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Welsch v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Kubes v. Hillman Coal & Coke Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
3Cited by3 opinions
- Haywood v. Henrietta Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Skiba v. Nick Calvitti Coal Co. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- James v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934