Legal Opinion

Estate of Smith

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1948No. L. A. 20031PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an appeal by contestants from a judgment admitting a will to probate.

The facts are not in dispute. The questions presented concern the legal effect of an alleged revocation of the will and the correctness of the court’s ruling admitting evidence over objection of the testatrix’ declarations bearing upon her revocatory intent.

On July 22, 1942, the decedent, then about 58 years of age and describing herself as a widow without descendants, executed a duly attested typewritten document consisting of two pages which she declared to be her last will and testament. By this instrument she…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lockbihler v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Estate of WunderleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. In Re Estate of PlumelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. In re Estate of SoherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Estate of JanesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Estate of SargavakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Ohanneson v. LambrinidouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Estate of GolderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Schertzinger v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Estate of NielsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API