Legal Opinion

Estate of Golder

California Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1948No. S. F. 17521PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

The sole question in this case is whether a letter written by decedent William Henry Golder to his mother, appellant herein, constitutes a valid holographic will. We are of the opinion that the judgment of the trial court refusing to admit the document to probate must be affirmed.

The letter, dated December 13, 1941, was written while Golder was stationed in New York as a member of the United States Navy and was received by his mother in California a few days later. His wife Alyse, respondent herein, and their child were then living in Philadelphia. In the letter Golder said he was “lucky” in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of SpitzerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Estate of ButtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Estate of JanesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Clarke v. RansomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  5. In Re Estate of CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. BlochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Estate of TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Mills v. KellyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Estate of FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Estate of SpencerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API