Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Plumel

California Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1907No. S.F. No. 4616PublishedCited by 61 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

J. F. Plumel, a resident of the city and county of San Francisco, died on July 11, 1905, leaving an estate ponsisting of his separate property. His sole heirs at law were three sisters, the appellants here, and his widow, Annie Plumel, the respondent.

Two instruments, written respectively on the obverse and reverse sides of a single sheet of paper, were offered for probate as the will and codicil of the decedent, and both were admitted to probate. From the order admitting the alleged will to probate, the sisters prosecute this appeal.

The will was dated January 12, 1904. By its terms the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brown v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Lockbihler v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Carpenter v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. In re Estate of SoherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. In re Estate of BillingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Estate of WunderleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Estate of BernardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Thorn v. California Academy of SciencesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Estate of MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Noyes v. GerardMontana Supreme Court · 1909

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API