Schertzinger v. Williams
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.
This is an appeal by contestant after probate from a judgment denying the petition of contest.
Facts
The pertinent facts shown by the record before us are as follows: Decedent’s holographic will was admitted to probate July 24, 1959. Contestant on August 14, 1959, filed her contest of the will on the ground that the will was not dated as required by law and on the second ground that the will was the product of undue influence. This second ground was withdrawn and abandoned at the opening of the trial by contestant and the cause was tried on the sole ground that the will was not dated as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Finkler v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Estate of JanesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Estate of FayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Stroughton v. McGowanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Crosby v. Crockeranglo National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Estate of BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Estate of HelmarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Estate of ArcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Estate of CallahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.