Legal Opinion

Madsen v. Oakland Unified School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 1975No. Civ. 35276PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RATTIGAN, Acting P. J.

This litigation involves the legality of a grant of public funds made to respondent Oakland Unified School District by respondent City of Oakland. Commencing it as a purported citizen-taxpayer class action for declaratory relief against all the respondents, appellant Dean Madsen sought a judgment invalidating the grant and ordering reimbursement of the funds. After a nonjury trial at which the parties stipulated to all the pertinent facts, the trial court entered a judgment which expressly disallowed appellant’s various contentions and denied relief. He appeals…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Purdy & Fitzpatrick v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. In Re LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kreeft v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Tri County Apartment Ass'n v. City of Mountain ViewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Whisman v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Evans v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. City of Huntington Beach v. BecerraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API