Madsen v. Oakland Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RATTIGAN, Acting P. J.
This litigation involves the legality of a grant of public funds made to respondent Oakland Unified School District by respondent City of Oakland. Commencing it as a purported citizen-taxpayer class action for declaratory relief against all the respondents, appellant Dean Madsen sought a judgment invalidating the grant and ordering reimbursement of the funds. After a nonjury trial at which the parties stipulated to all the pertinent facts, the trial court entered a judgment which expressly disallowed appellant’s various contentions and denied relief. He appeals…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Purdy & Fitzpatrick v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kreeft v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Tri County Apartment Ass'n v. City of Mountain ViewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Whisman v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Evans v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- City of Huntington Beach v. BecerraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020