Legal Opinion
Whisman v. San Francisco Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 28, 1978No. Docket Nos. 40992, 41424, 41425PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FEINBERG, J.
Appellant San Francisco Unified School District appeals from the judgment granting respondents’ petition for a writ of mandate to compel appellant to reinstate respondents as supervisors AA.
Respondents are certified permanent employees of appellant. Respondent Whisman holds an elementary teaching credential and an elementary administration and supervision credential. He was hired by appellant in 1952 as a probationary elementary school teacher and became tenured as such in 1955. He was appointed an acting assistant principal in 1961 and an elementary school principal in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Natural Milk Producers Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Napa State Hospital v. FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- California Teachers Assn. v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Jones v. Palm Springs Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Quirk v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Gardner v. School District No. 55Idaho Supreme Court · 1985
- LaBelle v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.