Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Sowell v. Lovinger

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1983No. 82-1381PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole issue raised by this appeal is whether appellants have an adequate remedy at law by way of appeal and are thus precluded from seeking relief by way of mandamus and prohibition. See State, ex rel. St. Sava, v. Riley (1973), 36 Ohio St. 2d 171, 173-174 [65 O.O.2d 395]; State, ex rel. Woodbury, v. Spitler (1973), 34 Ohio St. 2d 134, 137 [63 O.O.2d 229], certiorari denied (1974), 415 U.S. 913 [69 O.O.2d 42].

Appellants’ complaint challenges appellee Lovinger’s right to hold the office of acting judge. In State v. Staten (1971), 25 Ohio St. 2d 107, 110 [54 *23O.O.2d 235], vacated on other…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Adams v. GusweilerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State ex rel. Woodbury v. SpitlerOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. StatenOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State ex rel. Woodbury v. SpitlerOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State ex rel. St. Sava Serbian Orthodox Church v. RileyOhio Supreme Court · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Johnson v. County CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Schucker v. MetcalfOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Bobb v. MarchantOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Williams v. Banner Buick, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. State ex rel. Jefferson County Children Services Board v. HallockOhio Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API