Legal Opinion

Wells v. Chrysler Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1984No. 83-1922PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole issue presented is whether a notice of appeal of a workers’ compensation claim pursuant to R.C. 4123.519, which did not designate the employer as such and which named the employer in the caption but not in the body of the appeal, is sufficient to vest jurisdiction in the court of common pleas. For the reasons that follow, this court reverses the decision of the court of appeals and finds that this notice of appeal was sufficient to vest jurisdiction and thereby holds that the grant of the motion to dismiss was improper.

R.C. 4123.519 sets forth five requirements for the notice of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cadle v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Mullins v. Whiteway Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State ex rel. Rockwell International v. FordOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Welsh Development Co. v. Warren County Regional Planning CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Kaiser v. Ameritemps, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Spencer v. Freight Handlers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Austin Co. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. City of Cleveland v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API